Perhaps we should consider what the next three or four questions would look
like to see how we will approach this question. When we figure out the county,
will we then narrow down the town and cities in that county? Worcester and
Middlesex counties have numerous towns with Essex close behind. It seems the only
logical progression to me but I can't see how we will get anywhere before our
questions are used up.

At this point, we could stop looking at counties and look at towns. We could
ask if it is in a town beginning with letters A through M, for instance. That
might eliminate a lot more places more quickly. Is there a stats person around
on this list?!

Mookie


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I was thinking along those lines too. That's also why I started thinking
about State Parks...that would significantly narrow it. I think your
suggestion is a great one..I just don't have a lot of further guesses on it
right now. :-)



Boston Rott

_____

From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of LetHerBox@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:00 PM
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [LbNA] Q9 .....



Perhaps we should consider what the next three or four questions would look
like to see how we will approach this question. When we figure out the
county,
will we then narrow down the town and cities in that county? Worcester and
Middlesex counties have numerous towns with Essex close behind. It seems the
only
logical progression to me but I can't see how we will get anywhere before
our
questions are used up.

At this point, we could stop looking at counties and look at towns. We could

ask if it is in a town beginning with letters A through M, for instance.
That
might eliminate a lot more places more quickly. Is there a stats person
around
on this list?!

Mookie

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I missed out on asking the last question, but are we ready to ask for an
area - say, within a x-mile radius of [insert town name here]? Picking
the right town and the optimal radius could narrow it down fairly quickly,
don't you think? And hoping it's the randomly answered question!

~speedsquare

--- LetHerBox@aol.com wrote:

> Perhaps we should consider what the next three or four questions would
> look
> like to see how we will approach this question. When we figure out the
> county,
> will we then narrow down the town and cities in that county? Worcester
> and
> Middlesex counties have numerous towns with Essex close behind. It seems
> the only
> logical progression to me but I can't see how we will get anywhere
> before our
> questions are used up.
>
> At this point, we could stop looking at counties and look at towns. We
> could
> ask if it is in a town beginning with letters A through M, for instance.
> That
> might eliminate a lot more places more quickly. Is there a stats person
> around
> on this list?!
>
> Mookie
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

And hoping it's the randomly answered question!



That is the rub..will it be the 'randomly' answered question???